Visual Prosthesis with an Improved Electrode Array Adapted for Foveal Stimulation

ABSTRACT

The present invention is an improved method of electrically stimulating percepts in a patient with a visual prosthesis, to induce a more controlled perception of light. In particular, the present invention is an improved electrode array to maximize retinal response. The array of the present invention is an array with a center section with no electrode, surrounded by a ring of small high density electrodes. Electrodes beyond to ring are gradually larger and more widely spaced.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of, and incorporates by reference, U.S.Provisional Patent Application 61/413,271, filed Nov. 12, 2010, forMethod of Controlling the Temporal Dynamics of Percepts in a VisualProsthesis. This application is related to an incorporates by reference,U.S. Pat. No. 7,149,585, for Variable Pitch Electrode Array, and U.S.Pat. No. 8,014,878, for Flexible Circuit Electrode Array.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is an improved method of electrically stimulatingpercepts in a patient with a visual prosthesis, to induce a morecontrolled perception of light. In particular, the present invention isan improved electrode array to maximize retinal response.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In 1755 LeRoy passed the discharge of a Leyden jar through the orbit ofa man who was blind from cataract and the patient saw “flames passingrapidly downwards.” Ever since, there has been a fascination withelectrically elicited visual perception. The general concept ofelectrical stimulation of retinal cells to produce these flashes oflight or phosphenes has been known for quite some time. Based on thesegeneral principles, some early attempts at devising prostheses foraiding the visually impaired have included attaching electrodes to thehead or eyelids of patients. While some of these early attempts met withsome limited success, these early prosthetic devices were large, bulkyand could not produce adequate simulated vision to truly aid thevisually impaired.

In the early 1930's, Foerster investigated the effect of electricallystimulating the exposed occipital pole of one cerebral hemisphere. Hefound that, when a point at the extreme occipital pole was stimulated,the patient perceived a small spot of light directly in front andmotionless (a phosphene). Subsequently, Brindley and Lewin (1968)thoroughly studied electrical stimulation of the human occipital(visual) cortex. By varying the stimulation parameters, theseinvestigators described in detail the location of the phosphenesproduced relative to the specific region of the occipital cortexstimulated. These experiments demonstrated: (1) the consistent shape andposition of phosphenes; (2) that increased stimulation pulse durationmade phosphenes brighter; and (3) that there was no detectableinteraction between neighboring electrodes which were as close as 2.4 mmapart.

As intraocular surgical techniques have advanced, it has become possibleto apply stimulation on small groups and even on individual retinalcells to generate focused phosphenes through devices implanted withinthe eye itself. This has sparked renewed interest in developing methodsand apparati to aid the visually impaired. Specifically, great efforthas been expended in the area of intraocular retinal prosthesis devicesin an effort to restore vision in cases where blindness is caused byphotoreceptor degenerative retinal diseases; such as retinitispigmentosa and age related macular degeneration which affect millions ofpeople worldwide.

Neural tissue can be artificially stimulated and activated by prostheticdevices that pass pulses of electrical current through electrodes onsuch a device. The passage of current causes changes in electricalpotentials across visual neuronal membranes, which can initiate visualneuron action potentials, which are the means of information transfer inthe nervous system.

Based on this mechanism, it is possible to input information into thenervous system by coding the sensory information as a sequence ofelectrical pulses which are relayed to the nervous system via theprosthetic device. In this way, it is possible to provide artificialsensations including vision.

One typical application of neural tissue stimulation is in therehabilitation of the blind. Some forms of blindness involve selectiveloss of the light sensitive transducers of the retina. Other retinalneurons remain viable, however, and may be activated in the mannerdescribed above by placement of a prosthetic electrode device on theinner (toward the vitreous) retinal surface (epiretinal). This placementmust be mechanically stable, minimize the distance between the deviceelectrodes and the visual neurons, control the electronic fielddistribution and avoid undue compression of the visual neurons.

In 1986, Bullara (U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,481) patented an electrodeassembly for surgical implantation on a nerve. The matrix was siliconewith embedded iridium electrodes. The assembly fit around a nerve tostimulate it.

Dawson and Radtke stimulated cat's retina by direct electricalstimulation of the retinal ganglion cell layer. These experimentersplaced nine and then fourteen electrodes upon the inner retinal layer(i.e., primarily the ganglion cell layer) of two cats. Their experimentssuggested that electrical stimulation of the retina with 30 to 100 μAcurrent resulted in visual cortical responses. These experiments werecarried out with needle-shaped electrodes that penetrated the surface ofthe retina (see also U.S. Pat. No. 4,628,933 to Michelson).

The Michelson '933 apparatus includes an array of photosensitive deviceson its surface that are connected to a plurality of electrodespositioned on the opposite surface of the device to stimulate theretina. These electrodes are disposed to form an array similar to a “bedof nails” having conductors which impinge directly on the retina tostimulate the retinal cells. U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,049 to Byers describesspike electrodes for neural stimulation. Each spike electrode piercesneural tissue for better electrical contact. U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,088 toNorman describes an array of spike electrodes for cortical stimulation.Each spike pierces cortical tissue for better electrical contact.

The art of implanting an intraocular prosthetic device to electricallystimulate the retina was advanced with the introduction of retinal tacksin retinal surgery. De Juan, et al. at Duke University Eye Centerinserted retinal tacks into retinas in an effort to reattach retinasthat had detached from the underlying choroid, which is the source ofblood supply for the outer retina and thus the photoreceptors. See,e.g., E. de Juan, et al., 99 Am. J. Ophthalmol. 272 (1985). Theseretinal tacks have proved to be biocompatible and remain embedded in theretina, and choroid/sclera, effectively pinning the retina against thechoroid and the posterior aspects of the globe. Retinal tacks are oneway to attach a retinal electrode array to the retina. U.S. Pat. No.5,109,844 to de Juan describes a flat electrode array placed against theretina for visual stimulation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,155 to Humayundescribes a retinal prosthesis for use with the flat retinal arraydescribed in de Juan.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,149,586 to Greenberg teaches an electrode array withvariable pitch, smaller electrodes closer together in the center andlarger electrodes further apart in the periphery.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,177,697 to Eckmiller discloses retinal electrode arraywith electrodes grouped to zones, each zone with different pitch.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is an improved method of electrically stimulatingpercepts in a patient with a visual prosthesis, to induce a morecontrolled perception of light. In particular, the present invention isan improved electrode array to maximize retinal response. The array ofthe present invention is an array with a center section with noelectrode, surrounded by a ring of small high density electrodes.Electrodes beyond to ring are gradually larger and more widely spaced.The array includes a center portion with no electrodes over the fovealpit, a high density of small electrodes surrounding the center portion,which gradually increase in both size and spatial pitch moving away fromthe fovea.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the implanted portion of the preferredretinal prosthesis.

FIG. 2 is a side view of the implanted portion of the preferred retinalprosthesis showing the strap fan tail in more detail.

FIG. 3 shows the components of a visual prosthesis fitting system.

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the preferred electrode array forretinal stimulation.

FIG. 5 is a table showing threshold vs. foveal distance.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing how retina physiology relates to theelectrode array of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The following description is of the best mode presently contemplated forcarrying out the invention. This description is not to be taken in alimiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of describing thegeneral principles of the invention. The scope of the invention shouldbe determined with reference to the claims.

FIGS. 1 and 2 present the general structure of a visual prosthesis usedin implementing the invention.

FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of the implanted portion of thepreferred retinal prosthesis. A flexible circuit 1 includes a flexiblecircuit electrode array 10 which is mounted by a retinal tack (notshown) or similar means to the epiretinal surface. The flexible circuitelectrode array 10 is electrically coupled by a flexible circuit cable12, which pierces the sclera and is electrically coupled to anelectronics package 14, external to the sclera.

The electronics package 14 is electrically coupled to a secondaryinductive coil 16. Preferably the secondary inductive coil 16 is madefrom wound wire. Alternatively, the secondary inductive coil 16 may bemade from a flexible circuit polymer sandwich with wire traces depositedbetween layers of flexible circuit polymer. The secondary inductive coilreceives power and data from a primary inductive coil 17, which isexternal to the body. The electronics package 14 and secondary inductivecoil 16 are held together by the molded body 18. The molded body 18holds the electronics package 14 and secondary inductive coil 16 end toend. The secondary inductive coil 16 is placed around the electronicspackage 14 in the molded body 18. The molded body 18 holds the secondaryinductive coil 16 and electronics package 14 in the end to endorientation and minimizes the thickness or height above the sclera ofthe entire device. The molded body 18 may also include suture tabs 20.The molded body 18 narrows to form a strap 22 which surrounds the scleraand holds the molded body 18, secondary inductive coil 16, andelectronics package 14 in place. The molded body 18, suture tabs 20 andstrap 22 are preferably an integrated unit made of silicone elastomer.Silicone elastomer can be formed in a pre-curved shape to match thecurvature of a typical sclera. However, silicone remains flexible enoughto accommodate implantation and to adapt to variations in the curvatureof an individual sclera. The secondary inductive coil 16 and molded body18 are preferably oval shaped. A strap 22 can better support an ovalshaped coil. It should be noted that the entire implant is attached toand supported by the sclera. An eye moves constantly. The eye moves toscan a scene and also has a jitter motion to improve acuity. Even thoughsuch motion is useless in the blind, it often continues long after aperson has lost their sight. By placing the device under the rectusmuscles with the electronics package in an area of fatty tissue betweenthe rectus muscles, eye motion does not cause any flexing which mightfatigue, and eventually damage, the device.

FIG. 2 shows a side view of the implanted portion of the retinalprosthesis, in particular, emphasizing the fan tail 24. When implantingthe retinal prosthesis, it is necessary to pass the strap 22 under theeye muscles to surround the sclera. The secondary inductive coil 16 andmolded body 18 must also follow the strap 22 under the lateral rectusmuscle on the side of the sclera. The implanted portion of the retinalprosthesis is very delicate. It is easy to tear the molded body 18 orbreak wires in the secondary inductive coil 16. In order to allow themolded body 18 to slide smoothly under the lateral rectus muscle, themolded body 18 is shaped in the form of a fan tail 24 on the endopposite the electronics package 14. The strap 22 further includes ahook 28 the aids the surgeon in passing the strap under the rectusmuscles.

Referring to FIG. 3, a Fitting System (FS) may be used to configure andoptimize the visual prosthesis (3) of the Retinal Stimulation System(1).

The Fitting System may comprise custom software with a graphical userinterface (GUI) running on a dedicated laptop computer (10). Within theFitting System are modules for performing diagnostic checks of theimplant, loading and executing video configuration files, viewingelectrode voltage waveforms, and aiding in conducting psychophysicalexperiments. A video module can be used to download a videoconfiguration file to a Video Processing Unit (VPU) (20) and store it innon-volatile memory to control various aspects of video configuration,e.g. the spatial relationship between the video input and theelectrodes. The software can also load a previously used videoconfiguration file from the VPU (20) for adjustment.

The Fitting System can be connected to the Psychophysical Test System(PTS), located for example on a dedicated laptop (30), in order to runpsychophysical experiments. In psychophysics mode, the Fitting Systemenables individual electrode control, permitting clinicians to constructtest stimuli with control over current amplitude, pulse-width, andfrequency of the stimulation. In addition, the psychophysics moduleallows the clinician to record subject responses. The PTS may include acollection of standard psychophysics experiments developed using forexample MATLAB (MathWorks) software and other tools to allow theclinicians to develop customized psychophysics experiment scripts.

Any time stimulation is sent to the VPU (20), the stimulation parametersare checked to ensure that maximum charge per phase limits, chargebalance, and power limitations are met before the test stimuli are sentto the VPU (20) to make certain that stimulation is safe.

Using the psychophysics module, important perceptual parameters such asperceptual threshold, maximum comfort level, and spatial location ofpercepts may be reliably measured.

Based on these perceptual parameters, the fitting software enablescustom configuration of the transformation between video image andspatio-temporal electrode stimulation parameters in an effort tooptimize the effectiveness of the retinal prosthesis for each subject.

The Fitting System laptop (10) is connected to the VPU (20) using anoptically isolated serial connection adapter (40). Because it isoptically isolated, the serial connection adapter (40) assures that noelectric leakage current can flow from the Fitting System laptop (10).

As shown in FIG. 3, the following components may be used with theFitting System according to the present disclosure. A Video ProcessingUnit (VPU) (20) for the subject being tested, a Charged Battery (25) forVPU (20), Glasses (5), a Fitting System (FS) Laptop (10), aPsychophysical Test System (PTS) Laptop (30), a PTS CD (not shown), aCommunication Adapter (CA) (40), a USB Drive (Security) (not shown), aUSB Drive (Transfer) (not shown), a USB Drive (Video Settings) (notshown), a Patient Input Device (RF Tablet) (50), a further Patient InputDevice (Jog Dial) (55), Glasses Cable (15), CA-VPU Cable (70), CFS-CACable (45), CFS-PTS Cable (46), Four (4) Port USB Hub (47), Mouse (60),LED Test Array (80), Archival USB Drive (49), an Isolation Transformer(not shown), adapter cables (not shown), and an External Monitor (notshown).

The external components of the Fitting System according to the presentdisclosure may be configured as follows. The battery (25) is connectedwith the VPU (20). The PTS Laptop (30) is connected to FS Laptop (10)using the CFS-PTS Cable (46). The PTS Laptop (30) and FS Laptop (10) areplugged into the Isolation Transformer (not shown) using the AdapterCables (not shown). The Isolation Transformer is plugged into the walloutlet. The four (4) Port USB Hub (47) is connected to the FS laptop(10) at the USB port. The mouse (60) and the two Patient Input Devices(50) and (55) are connected to four (4) Port USB Hubs (47). The FSlaptop (10) is connected to the Communication Adapter (CA) (40) usingthe CFS-CA Cable (45). The CA (40) is connected to the VPU (20) usingthe CA-VPU Cable (70). The Glasses (5) are connected to the VPU (20)using the Glasses Cable (15).

The present invention provides an array of variable pitch, variable sizeelectrodes. FIG. 4 shows the invention applied to a retinal stimulatorfor artificial sight. Electrodes on the preferred retinal electrodearray 10 begin very small and close together beyond the center section98 at the fovea. The electrode array has a center section 98, with noelectrodes, possibly a hole in the array. A hole in the array would aida surgeon in properly placing the array. The center section 98 is placeddirectly over the fovea and is preferably about 1 mm (millimeter) inradius from the center of the fovea. This area exhibits high thresholdsof perception and is generally not worth stimulating. An inner ring ofelectrodes 92 are the smallest and the closest together and stimulatethe portion of the retina with the lowest thresholds. The inner ring ofelectrodes 98 is preferably about 1.2 mm in radius from the center ofthe fovea. A subsequent ring of electrodes 94 includes slightly largerelectrodes with a slightly larger spatial pitch, as thresholds in thisarea are slightly higher. The ideal area to stimulate is between 1.2 mmand 3 mm from the center of the fovea. Peripheral electrodes 96 arelarger, with a larger spatial pitch, and beyond 3 mm from the center ofthe fovea.

The inner ring of electrodes 92 are approximately 10 microns in widthand are placed 5 microns apart. The size and pitch of the electrodesincreases proportionally moving away from the fovea. The preferredelectrode array extends further from the fovea in the direction oppositefrom the optic nerve (not shown), with the largest electrode 96 at thefurthest point from the optic nerve. The largest electrode is 1millimeter in width and 4 millimeters from the nearest electrode. Thepreferred array body is curved to match the curvature of the retina.

It should be noted that FIG. 4 is not drawn to scale as a scale drawingwould be impossible, given PTO accepted dimensions. Further, thepreferred electrode array would have far more electrodes than thoseshown. Several different types of electrode are possible in a retinalelectrode array such as spikes, mushrooms or other elongated or recessedshapes. The present invention is independent of the type of electrodeused. The variation of electrode size is due to limitations in thecharge density supported by current electrode designs. As electrodes arefarther from the fovea greater charge is needed, and therefore, largerelectrodes are need. Future electrode designs may improve charge densitycapability obviating the need to vary electrode size. In such a case, itwould still be advantageous to vary electrode pitch.

FIG. 5 shows the results of experiments on human retina. The table showsthresholds in μA (micro amps) versus distance from the center of thefovea in μm (micrometers). A center area 102 within 1 mm of the centerof the fovea has higher thresholds. A ring of about 1.2 mm to 3 mm 104from the center of the fovea has improved thresholds, but thresholdsgradually increase with distance from the center of the fovea. The areabeyond 3 mm from the center of the fovea 160 again has high thresholds.

In order to determine how many subjects exhibited a significantcorrelation between threshold and electrode-fovea distance without beingaffected by the confounding factor of electrode-retina distance, onlyelectrodes in contact with the retina were considered. Electrodes withthresholds below 25 μA had a mean foveal-distance of 1777±121 μm (n=56electrodes) compared with a mean foveal-distance of 2318±76 μm (n=299electrodes) for all electrodes with thresholds above 25 μA. Electrodesin contact with thresholds below 50 μA had a mean foveal-distance of1886±81 μm (n=134 electrodes) compared with a mean foveal-distance of2439±93 μm (n=216 electrodes) for all electrodes with thresholds above50 μA. Although electrodes with thresholds below these cutoff amplitudeswere on average closer to the fovea compared with all other electrodesin contact with the retina, a non-monotonic relationship between meanthreshold and the percentage of electrodes with thresholds below 233 μAwas observed when these threshold measures were plotted againstfoveocentric annular bin. (Bins of electrodes contacting the retina were500 pm wide; ranged from 11 to 63 electrodes.)

Mean threshold exhibited a broad minimum ranging from 1-2.5 mm away fromthe fovea, with an absolute minima of 93±14 μA for the 1-1.5 mm range.The percentage of electrodes with thresholds below 233 μA had a maximumof 90.8% (57 of 63 electrodes) in the 1.5-2 μm bin. When testing wasperformed up to the 677 μA limit 100% of electrodes (n=43) hadthresholds in the 0.5-1 mm bin. For all electrodes in contact with themacula (within 3 mm of fovea centralis), 80.9% had thresholds below 233μA and 90.3% had thresholds below 677 μA.

Single variable regression analysis weighted by electrode count wasperformed in order to quantify and compare the effects of meanelectrode-fovea distance and light threshold (implanted and fellow eyes)on mean electrode threshold, and percentage of available electrodes withthresholds below both the 0.35 mC/cm² (233 μA) and 1 mC/cm² (677 μA)charge density limits. Subjects with at least five confirmed electrodesin contact with the retina were included when regressing meanelectrode-fovea distance.

Neither mean electrode-fovea distance nor mean geometric electrode-foveadistance correlated with any of the response measures when electrodes atall retinal distances were included (p>0.2). Linear regression alsoshowed no significant relationship with measures of threshold when onlyelectrodes in contact with the retina were considered. This isconsistent with the fact that both mean threshold and percent ofelectrodes with thresholds below 233 μA had some local minima or maximawhen plotted against binned foveal distance. However, when onlyelectrodes in contact with the retina, and within 3 mm of the fovea wereconsidered there was a strong direct relationship between mean fovealdistance and measures of threshold (R²≧0.49; p<0.01). In contrast, whenonly electrodes more than 3 mm from the fovea were considered there wasno significant relationship with any measures of threshold (p>0.1).Though weaker than these mean measures of retinal and foveal distance,implanted eye light threshold also correlated well with mean electrodethreshold (p<0.01) and the percentage of electrodes with thresholdsbelow 0.35 mC/cm² (<0.05). Light threshold of the fellow eye did notsignificantly correlate with any of the response measures, however, thegoodness-of-fit and p-values did show the same relative trend as withthe implanted eye light thresholds. There was no correlation with age(p>0.5; n=7 subjects) or self-reported onset of blindness (p>0.5; n=8subjects).

FIG. 6 shows how this data relates to retina physiology. The center ofthe fovea is a pit 108 surrounded by an up slope 110 which is surroundedby a down slope 112. The pit 108 and up slope 110 are about 1 mm inradius. The down slope 112 is between 1.2 mm and 3 mm. It is the downslope that exhibits the lowest thresholds. The retina is made up oflayers, the retinal limiting membrane 114, the ganglion cell layer 116,the inner nuclear layer 118, the outer nuclear layer 120 and the rodsand cones 122. It should be noted that the down slope 122 has the lowestthresholds and the thickest ganglion layer. The up slope 110 and pit 108have a highly compressed ganglion cell layer.

In an alternate embodiment of the present invention the center portionis not free of electrodes, but has a few large electrodes (or even asingle large electrode) similar to the electrodes in the periphery. Thethreshold response within the foveal pit is similar to the thresholdresponse in the periphery.

Accordingly, what has been shown is an improved method making a hermeticpackage for implantation in a body. While the invention has beendescribed by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof, itis understood that numerous modifications and variations could be madethereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the spiritand scope of the invention. It is therefore to be understood that withinthe scope of the claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise thanas specifically described herein.

1. An implantable electrode array for retinal stimulation comprising; Anarray body suitable to be implanted adjacent to a retina near its fovea;a central portion of the array body 1 millimeter in radius or greatercontains no electrodes; and electrodes on the array body surrounding thecentral portion.
 2. The implantable electrode array for visualstimulation according to claim 1, wherein the electrodes are spacedacross the array body at varying spatial pitch.
 3. The implantableelectrode array for visual stimulation according to claim 2, whereinspatial pitch intervals are smaller toward the central portion of thearray body and increasing toward an outer edge of the array body.
 4. Theimplantable electrode array according to claim 1, wherein the electrodesare of varying size.
 5. The implantable electrode array according toclaim 4, wherein the varying size of the electrodes is small toward thecentral portion of the array body, and increases toward an outer edge ofthe array body.
 6. The implantable electrode array according to claim 2,wherein the varying intervals of the electrodes increases proportionallyto a distance from the central portion.
 7. The implantable electrodearray according to claim 5, wherein the varying size of the electrodesincreases proportionally to a distance from the central portion.
 8. Theimplantable electrode array according to claim 1, wherein the electrodesare elongated electrodes.
 9. The implantable electrode array accordingto claim 8, wherein the elongated electrodes are mushroom shapedelectrodes.
 10. The implantable electrode array according to claim 8,wherein the elongated electrodes are spike electrodes.
 11. Theimplantable electrode array according to claim 8, wherein the elongatedelectrodes are of varying size.
 12. The implantable electrode arrayaccording to claim 4, wherein the electrodes are elongated electrodes.13. The implantable electrode array according to claim 5, wherein theelectrodes are elongated electrodes.
 14. The implantable electrode arrayaccording to claim 6, wherein the electrodes are elongated electrodes.15. The implantable electrode array according to claim 1, wherein thearray body defines a void over the central portion.
 16. The implantableelectrode array according to claim 1, wherein all electrodes fallbetween 1 millimeter and 3 millimeters from the center of the centerportion.
 17. The implantable electrode array according to claim 1,wherein electrodes beyond 3 millimeters from the center of the centerportion are larger and further apart.
 18. A visual prosthesiscomprising: a video capture device; a video processor receiving videodata from the video capture device and converting the video data tostimulation signals; an implantable neural stimulator receivingstimulation signals; an array body suitable to be implanted adjacent toa retina near its fovea; a central portion of the array body 1 milimeteror greater without electrodes; and electrodes driven by the neuralstimulator on the array body surrounding the central portion.
 19. Thevisual prosthesis according to claim 18, wherein the electrodes arespaced across the array body at varying intervals and the intervals aresmaller toward the central portion of the array body and increasingtoward an outer edge of the array body proportionately to a distancefrom the central portion.
 20. The visual prosthesis according to claim19, wherein the electrodes are of varying size, and the varying size ofthe electrodes is small toward the central portion of the array body,and increases toward an outer edge of the array body proportionately toa distance from the central portion.